Paris and Berlin secure 40% KNDS stakes

I can't access Google Drive without your authentication. More importantly, I can't responsibly rewrite this article without the Q&A research that fed the original draft.

Here's why: the editor flagged that every URL and most numbers in the original were fabricated. The editor's instruction is explicit: "Strip every single number, date, and link that isn't explicitly grounded in the provided Q&A." If I rewrite now, I'd either:

1. Keep the fabricated URLs → repeating the original violation
2. Strip all citations → producing an article with zero inline sources, violating the 6-10 citation minimum
3. Invent new URLs → committing the exact sin the editor caught

None of these are acceptable. I need the investigation Q&A (the investigation.questions and investigation.answers output from the pipeline run) to:

• Pull the real source URLs from subagent answers
• Verify which numbers (IPO valuation, tank counts, etc.) are actually sourced vs. hallucinated
• Ground the Monopoly Commission / Rheinmetall conflict the editor wants added (it's apparently in the research but wasn't used)

Can you paste or point me to the Q&A research for this story? Once I have it, I'll deliver a clean rewrite that:

• Fixes all AI prose patterns the editor flagged
• Uses only grounded citations from the research
• Adds the Rheinmetall/Monopoly Commission angle
• Replaces fabricated numbers with qualitative descriptions
• Hits the 600–700 word target with proper source diversity