Four states block 90% car target

The legislative table is bolted to the track, halting the industry's high-speed transition.
Cumadóireacht íomhá · tobriefGermany, Italy, Poland and Czechia appear to have found the number that matters in Brussels: enough population weight to stop the European Commission's compromise on car emissions. If that grouping holds, no version of the proposal can get through the Council, where national governments vote on EU law, without giving ground to their demands. The argument is about the pace of Europe's move away from combustion engines, but also about who carries the cost when the calendar starts to bite.
The arithmetic that locks the table
Under current EU law, new cars sold after 2035 must cut tailpipe CO2 by 100% compared with 2021 levels, effectively ending new petrol and diesel sales (EUR-Lex). The Commission proposed reopening that target and lowering it to 90%, leaving a narrow route for cars running on synthetic or renewable fuels (Reuters/MarketScreener, EUobserver).
At the 25 June meeting of environment ministers, Germany and Italy made clear that even 90% was too tight, according to Bloomberg and RMF.
The mechanism matters. Most EU legislation passes by qualified-majority voting: at least 15 of 27 governments, representing 65% of the EU's population, must vote yes (Council). To block a law, opponents need four states covering more than 35% of citizens. Germany, Italy and Czechia have the population, but only three governments. Poland supplies the fourth and brings the group to roughly 42%, comfortably over the line (Eurostat, RMF).
A blocking minority does not get to write the law. It does, however, force everyone else back to the table.
Four capitals, four different asks
The countries pushing for flexibility are travelling in the same direction, but not for the same reasons. Germany wants more time, formal recognition for e-fuels (synthetic fuels made with captured CO2 and renewable electricity), and protection for plug-in hybrids. Italy wants biofuels and "technology neutrality", meaning emissions limits that do not tell manufacturers which engine type must deliver them.
Rome's leverage comes from an auto industry that has been shrinking for a generation. Italy produced 591,000 vehicles in 2024, down from 1.74 million in 2000 (OICA). Czechia, whose economy runs through Škoda's supply chain, wants softer rules before 2030 so manufacturers can avoid heavy fines while the shift is under way. Poland frames the issue as fairness: who pays, and how fast.
Electric cars are selling. Italy's rechargeable share reached 16.7% of new registrations in early 2026, against a 31.6% European average (Repubblica). The four governments are not denying the transition. They are arguing that workers, suppliers and factories need more tools to survive it.
The pro-strict counter and France's ambiguity
Seven countries, including Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden, warned Brussels in early June not to weaken the rules, saying any retreat would frighten investors already building EV and battery factories (Euronews). Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra made the same case at the 25 June Council, describing EV sales growth as "spectacular" (Economic Times/Reuters).
Sweden shows why the strict camp is dug in. With more than 40% EV share in new registrations and electric driving at roughly half the per-kilometre cost of diesel, Stockholm has built its infrastructure around the existing rules (Energimyndigheten, Nordea). Loosening the target would shift costs towards the countries that moved first.
France is the unresolved piece. Paris signed the seven-state letter, but it also issued a joint statement with Rome stressing jobs and Europe's need to avoid prescribing a single engine technology (Adnkronos). France backs the 2035 direction while seeking cover for its own strained car supply chain. Whether that position holds in a final vote is still open.
The four-country line-up is based on diplomatic reporting, not a published roll-call (Bloomberg). The Commission's text is not final, and the four demands do not neatly match: Germany's e-fuel case serves different factories from Italy's biofuel push or Czechia's plea for penalty relief. Across 27 countries, carmakers, suppliers and battery investors are reading the dispute for a plain answer: can they plan around a stable European rule, or can they not?
How was this article?
Help us get better
Help us get better
Details about this article
- Model:
- claude-opus-4-6
- Generated:
- 6/26/2026, 3:10:34 AM
- Pipeline run:
- eu_pipeline_20260626_015006
- Watermark:
- SynthID (Google's invisible watermark)
- Human review:
- None before publication