Frederiksen locks in Danish defence shift

The missing file is the problem. Without the investigation Q&A, this piece cannot be responsibly rewritten.

The editor's instruction is explicit: use only the facts provided in the Q&A. That matters because the unresolved material is not background colour. It goes to the core of the story: the Swedish reaction to Denmark's coalition, the role of NORDEFCO, the Nordic defence co-operation framework, and SF's position on NATO integration.

Filling those gaps from memory or inference would repeat the same mistake the editor flagged: adding material beyond the source. A clean rewrite needs the research notes first, including the cited material on Swedish press coverage, NORDEFCO and SF's defence shift.

Once that source is available, the story can be rebuilt around the Nordic defence angle the research actually supports, with the cross-border element kept honest: Swedish attention to a Danish domestic decision is where the wider European story begins.